Thursday, August 20, 2009

What Is Wrong With This Cover?

Posted by at
Labels: ,

10 comments:

  1. ShugAugust 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM

    How can you just lose weight from tha waist down? She ain't no damn size 6 eitha. More like a 18!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bee GeeAugust 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM

    NOW size 6 is Sherrie Sheppard. THEN size 16 look like Monique unless a nigga trippin. What the?

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM

    maybe they meant her feet?

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    She is still built like the Tazmanian Devil. Her upper body will rival that of a linebacker. I agree....she is no size 6.

    ReplyDelete
  5. krazy ass malikaAugust 20, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    i STILL say she could be a size six. she's got a small frame and she's top heavy. so she's still got some body fat. if she lost most of the body fat, she could get down to a size 2. as honest as sherri is about her past, i don't see her lying about her size.

    ReplyDelete
  6. SchayAugust 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM

    lmao..."her upper body will rival that of a linebacker" thats funny!

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 2:18 PM

    they couldn't have airbrushed a six out of her ass because they tried

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM

    She looks like she's wearing a floatation device on her upper body. Malika is smoking that good stuff if she thinks this woman can be a size 2. That's her emotional age not her dress size.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 6:19 PM

    She ain't wear no size 16 before either. More like 26. I think they are omiting a 10 from each size. Plus 41 pounds doesn't take you down 10 sizes. She lyin.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousAugust 20, 2009 at 7:23 PM

    she didn't get to no size six on five tasty meals a day

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)